染雾雅思大作文真题 篇一：科技对人类社会的影响
随着科技的不断进步和发展，它已经深刻地改变了人类社会的方方面面。科技的进步对人类社会有着积极的影响，但也存在一些负面的影响。本文将探讨科技对人类社会的影响，并提出一些解决方法。
首先，科技的发展为人类社会带来了巨大的便利。比如，通讯技术的进步使得人与人之间的联系更加紧密，无论距离有多远。人们可以通过手机、电子邮件、社交媒体等方式随时随地与亲朋好友保持联系。此外，科技的进步也极大地提高了生产力和效率。例如，工业自动化和机器人技术的应用使得生产过程更加高效，减少了人力成本和资源浪费。这些都为人类社会的发展和进步做出了重要贡献。
然而，科技的发展也带来了一些负面的影响。首先，科技的进步导致了部分工作岗位的消失。例如，自动化技术的发展使得一些传统的劳动力需求减少，导致了一些人失去了工作机会。其次，科技的发展也给环境带来了一定的破坏。例如，工业化的快速发展导致了大量的污染和资源消耗，对环境造成了严重的影响。
针对上述问题，我们应该采取一些措施来解决。首先，政府应该加强对科技发展的引导和监管，避免科技对人类社会的负面影响。其次，教育部门应该加强对人才培养的重视，为人们提供更多的技术技能培训，以适应科技发展带来的变革。此外，我们也应该积极推动低碳环保的生活方式，减少对环境的负面影响。
总之，科技的发展对人类社会有着积极的影响，但也存在一些负面的影响。我们应该重视科技的发展，同时采取一些措施来解决科技发展所带来的问题，以实现科技和人类社会的和谐发展。
雅思大作文真题 篇二：全球化对文化的影响
全球化是一个不可逆转的趋势，它已经深刻地改变了人类社会的方方面面。在全球化的背景下，不同国家和文化之间的交流和融合变得更加频繁和紧密。本文将探讨全球化对文化的影响，并提出一些解决方法。
首先，全球化使得不同国家和文化之间的交流和融合更加容易。通过现代交通和通讯技术的发展，人们可以很方便地旅行到世界各地，了解不同国家的文化和风俗习惯。此外，全球化也提供了更多的机会和平台，使得不同国家的艺术、音乐、电影等文化产品可以在全球范围内传播和接受。这种文化的交流和融合有助于增进不同国家之间的相互了解和友谊。
然而，全球化也带来了一些负面的影响。首先，全球化可能导致文化的同质化。在全球化的进程中，一些主流文化可能会取代一些较小文化的特色，使得文化的多样性受到威胁。其次，全球化也可能导致文化的商业化。在全球化的浪潮下，一些文化产品可能更多地关注商业利益，而忽略了文化的独特性和内涵。
针对上述问题，我们应该采取一些措施来解决。首先，政府应该加强对文化保护的力度，保护和传承本国的文化遗产和传统。其次，我们应该鼓励人们主动了解和尊重其他国家和文化的差异性，促进文化多样性的发展。此外，我们也应该推动文化教育的普及，增加人们对本国和其他国家文化的了解和欣赏。
总之，全球化对文化有着积极的影响，但也存在一些负面的影响。我们应该重视文化的保护和传承，同时采取一些措施来解决全球化对文化带来的问题，以实现文化的多样性和共同发展。
雅思大作文真题 篇三
雅思大作文真题范文
雅思写作真题：城镇开发区种树还
Some people think that it is more important to plant more trees in open areas in towns and cities than provides more housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
有人认为比起提供更多的房子，在城镇开放地区种更多的树更为重要。你在多大程度上同意或者不同意?
参考范文【1】
Urbanization urges some city dwellers to reckon that priorities should be given to vegetation over constructions when it comes to the rare empty lots. In my view, they are being too naive and arbitrary since the answer to the exploitation of the open area lies on the size of the area.
On the one hand, if the targeted area of the open space is limited, it is better to grow trees rather than construct houses. Otherwise, small spacing between buildings would add more sense of oppression and depression to city residents and white collars. Besides, the function of trees inhaling carbon dioxide and exhaling oxygen would dramatically alleviate greenhouse gas effects. More importantly, trees are essential in preserving soil and water and preventing desertification.
On the other hand, the spare land, when large enough, will be of greater value with a new building. Adequate residential districts will ease the intense of high housing price and multi-story commercial towers will accommodate a larger number of employed gifts and talents. The reason why a city can be called a city is that it is convenient for people around it to go there within a short time. Obviously, buildings allow the influx of new blood that stimulates the vitality and creativity of a city while trees seem to be inappropriate for them to meet and talk over coffee.
In a nutshell, it is the area of the open spaces that determines whether there should be more greenery or concrete instead, so it is far from comprehensive for some impetuous environmentalists to blindly appeal for more trees wherever urban spare spaces are found.
参考范文【2】
When it comes to the issue about how towns and cities could utilize their open areas, some people may argue that planting more trees seems more crucial than constructing more houses, but I cannot agree with this opinion.
Admittedly, having more trees may contribute to protecting our environment. Currently, vehicles may produce a lot of toxic gases, posing a threat to the environment, especially the environment in downtown. Then, if there exist more trees in a city or a town, those plants could filter some gases, such as carbon dioxide that may aggravate global warming. Nevertheless, offering residents more dwelling places may be one of the top priorities for the authorities.
Initially, a larger number of houses in cities could alleviate dweller’s economic burdens. It is common that the price of real estate in some cities could be so high that normal citizens cannot afford it. If governments could supply more houses, then, the price of housing may be lowered correspondingly since the supply of housing may exceed its demand. Then, more inpiduals are potent to own a house in cities, but not live in a temporary one anymore.
Furthermore, building more houses in towns and counties could also serve to boost local economy. When governments decide to construct more buildings in towns, it may lead to a better economic outlook. For example, if there were more houses available for either living or commercial purpose in a town, more investors would find its potential and naturally more funding would also be allocated to that town. Then, local economy could be improved a lot with both financial support from governments and private investment from merchants.
In sum, considering that a larger quantity of houses could reduce economic burdens of citizens and function as a catalyst for rural development simultaneously, building more houses deserves more attention and budgets from the government.
